A comparison of bill clinton and machiavellis the prince

Bush the 43rd inherited a strong economy and a surplus, yet now there is stagnation and a steadily increasing deficit. We see a threat to our life, liberty and property. Ruling a kingdom is, in some ways, easier than winning a Democratic primary against a more liberal opponent.

And he continued to participate in republican circles throughout the length of his life. We remember what freedom is, and as long as we have that memory, we will not be destroyed. To Machiavelli, forms of deceit that are easy for the public to see through are not worth pursuing.

It has a matter-of-fact tone, and all advice is based on history and observation. I doubt the nobles are at all displeased with his performance, but as they already know, we are the deciding factor.

Richard Reeves is a syndicated columnist. Another school of thought attests that Machiavelli was playing the game of thrones, which would explain his contradictory political attitudes.

Machiavelli’s President

Meanwhile we have an unfortunate tendency of wanting to be protected so we too try and empower one of our own. The trouble is that they are stupid, unconvincing and ineffective. And Clinton needs help with voter turnout. Greatness may be beyond the reach of President Clinton because his one attempt at a great undertaking, national health care, produced nothing.

He only applauds it when it works. In republics there is more vitality, greater hatred, and more desire for vengeance, which will never permit them to allow the memory of their former liberty to rest; so that the safest way is to destroy them.

He who obtains sovereignty by the assistance of the nobles maintains himself with more difficulty than he who comes to it by the aid of the people, because the former finds himself with many around him who consider themselves his equals, and because of this he can neither rule nor manage them to his liking.

Lorenzo most likely never read it, and it did not win Machiavelli any favors. He was imprisoned, tortured and exiled for suspicion of plotting against the new state and for his republican ties with the previous government. We see through the lies.

Instead he should be perceived this way while acting in an opposite manner. On Being Loved or Feared Different from popular belief, Machiavelli does not exclusively favor the quality of fear over love. Chafetz, American-born and back to see his daughter graduate from Columbia, and I were talking about Bill Clinton.

He prefers The Prince to have both attributes and only picks fear if both cannot be achieved. The great leaders Nobody has ever accused Bill Clinton of being inflexible. This is a warning to Prince Obama, and the next Prince, and all the Princes to follow. In his interviews on that subject, the Italian was taken by a particularly Clintonesque answer to one of his questions: This allows Obama to disassociate from cruelty, fear and dominance, leaving these qualities to be attributed to the entity of government.

That may be the good news. A prince chosen by the people too needs to be wary of the nobles. If Niccolo Machiavelli were to evaluate the Bush Administration, he would find much to approve of. Despite overwhelming evidence that global warming threatens the planet, the President stubbornly insists that there is no scientific consensus on the subject and, therefore, supports business as usual.

Political historians acknowledge that there are two competing standards used to evaluate any American president. The cardinal said this:The Prince Niccolò Machiavelli 2: Hereditary principalities Part I Kinds of principality How to get and retain them Chapter 1 Different kinds of principalities, and how to acquire them All states, all powers that rule over men, are either republics or principalities.

(I am saying all this about the past as well. > Bill Clinton: War Leader or “Indolent Prince?” Bill Clinton: War Leader or “Indolent Prince?” Bill Clinton resembles these “indolent princes” far more than the great democratic war leaders of the past.

Machiavelli Would Be Disappointed In Hillary Clinton

This does not bode well for the security and interests of the American Republic. If Lorenzo de Medici was the Italian political theorist’s prince, then George W. Bush is Machiavelli’s president. The media certainly shares some. A Comparison of the Leader in Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince and President George W.

Bush. 1 The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. To the great Lorenzo Di Piero De Medici.

He's Machiavellian, and that's a compliment

Those who try to obtain the favourable attention of a prince are accustomed to. killarney10mile.com: the prince- machiavelli. From The Community. Amazon Try Prime All Go Search EN Hello. Sign in Account & Lists Sign in Account & Lists Orders Try Prime Cart 0. Your killarney10mile.com

A comparison of bill clinton and machiavellis the prince
Rated 4/5 based on 37 review