The Wikipedia Deletion policy outlines the circumstances in which entire articles can be deleted. The verb " rivercrab " colloquially refers to censorship of the Internet, particularly in Asia.
Thus by relying upon out-of-the-box filtering systems, the detailed task of deciding what is or is not acceptable speech may be outsourced to the commercial vendors. The question, therefore, is not whether we ought to have constraints on speech but what kinds of constraints?
With this freedom taken away from us, the major difference between us and animals will be no longer there. Free-speech idealists argue that the solution to bad speech misinformation, lies, abusive language, etc.
This is censorship at the point of reception. Some countries block web sites related to religion and minority groups, often when these movements represent a threat to the ruling regimes.
Censorship is an institutional constraint. Some people believe that media being censored is absolutely vital and claims that it is there to protect people, while others suggest that censorship denies access to vital information.
Overview[ edit ] Many of the challenges associated with Internet censorship are similar to those for offline censorship of more traditional media such as newspapers, magazines, books, music, radio, television, and film. But bad speech can, and often does, drown out the good. This is achieved by returning a fake "Not Found" error message when an attempt is made to access a blocked website.
Publishers, authors, and their families may be subject to threats, attacks, beatings, and even murder. All editing decisions are open to discussion and review. Circumvention is an inherent problem for those wishing to censor the Internet because filtering and blocking do not remove content from the Internet, but instead block access to it.
We may self-censor for good reasons, such as politeness, but sometimes we self-censor because we see someone else made into a negative example and we fear it could happen to us.
When a major portal does this, it has a similar effect as censorship.
Sometimes this exclusion is done to satisfy a legal or other requirement, other times it is purely at the discretion of the portal.
However circumvention may not be possible by non-tech-savvy users, so blocking and filtering remain effective means of censoring the Internet access of large numbers of users.
And it sets out to make the establishment and upholding of their dignity Internet censorship circumvention Internet censorship circumvention is the processes used by technologically savvy Internet users to bypass the technical aspects of Internet filtering and gain access to the otherwise censored material.
On 06 Augustfor example, several major platforms, including YouTube and Facebookexecuted a coordinated, permanent ban on all accounts and media associated with conservative talk show host, Alex Jones, and his popular media platform, InfoWars, citing "hate speech" and "glorifying violence.
The Twitter Terms of Service state: In some cases the censoring authorities may surreptitiously block content to mislead the public into believing that censorship has not been applied. In some countries, individuals that gain access to otherwise restricted content may be violating the law and if caught can be expelled, fired, jailed, or subject to other punishments and loss of access.
We should encourage the release of classified information that reveals government abuses, but ban lawmakers from becoming lobbyists once they leave office. Publishers and authors may accept bribes to include, withdraw, or slant the information they present. Nevertheless, blocking remains an effective means of limiting access to sensitive information for most users when censors, such as those in Chinaare able to devote significant resources to building and maintaining a comprehensive censorship system.
If the target Web site is hosted in a shared hosting serverall websites on the same server will be blocked. Domain name system DNS filtering and redirection: If these institutions were to offer too much freedom, they would be unable to perpetuate the social relations that keep them functioning.Internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet enacted by regulators, or on their own initiative.
Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other. Censorship is necessary to avoid offending certain people.
Certain things that may be considered offensive to a group of people, whether it's by race, religion or political beliefs, have to be censored to avoid offending the moral values of others.
Censorship isn't needed anymore, ever since the internet became wide spread you can access beheadings, porn and other things with next to no security checks.
Plus the censorship is so messed up today, you can have people like Miley Cyrus basically dry hump a wrecking ball and you can watch that on TV but you can't say the word gun.
In some cases, I'd argue that censorship is essential. The right to say absolutely anything at all is simply not a right, nor should it ever be. For example, if someone wants to make a claim about a product that is not true: "This product cures cancer".
The most common form of censorship is self-censorship, or censorship at the point of production, which means you have internalized the censor's rules and decided to abide by them of your own volition.
The most important point against the censorship of internet is that it is against the freedom of speech and it violates human rights. The internet is an important communicative tool, which provides a platform of people from all around the world to make free speech.Download